After speaking with Angela Huyue Zhang, a law professor from Hong Kong who will be teaching at the University of Southern California this fall, I was inspired by her insights on interpreting the logic and patterns behind China’s tech regulations. Our conversation covered a range of topics, including how the Chinese government often vacillates between regulating tech too heavily and not enough, how local governments go to great lengths to protect local tech companies, and why AI companies in China are currently receiving more government support than other sectors.
One particularly interesting aspect of our conversation was Zhang’s explanation of how market overreactions to Chinese tech policies have become an important tool for tech regulators today. According to Zhang, investors are constantly making bets on whether tech companies will thrive or suffer, always on the lookout for policy signals indicating China’s stance on specific technologies. As a result, they tend to overreact to every move made by the Chinese government.
For instance, last December when a draft proposal was released to regulate and limit gaming activities, investors panicked despite the proposal being not significantly unusual. This incident led to a significant drop in the market value of China’s top gaming companies. The drastic responses from the market actually prompted China’s tech regulators to shelve the draft law temporarily to ease market fears.
Zhang highlights that these fluctuations in market sentiment can have a more significant impact on tech firms than actual regulatory actions. In previous crackdowns, the most significant harm suffered by these firms came in the form of changing market sentiment rather than monetary fines. This example underscores how important it is for investors and policymakers alike to understand how market reactions can shape regulatory outcomes in China.
