Social media platforms, such as Facebook and Instagram, are being urged to consider putting warning labels on their sites by Congress. The US Surgeon General believes that these platforms need to disclose the mental health risks to users under the age of 18. These risks range from issues like depression to unregulated nervous systems.
The brain’s chemical reward pathway is responsible for social media’s addictive nature. Dopamine, a neurotransmitter that plays a crucial role in the reward pathway, is released when we engage in activities that make us feel good, such as spending time with friends or eating a delicious meal. This release of dopamine makes us want to continue doing those activities, leading to an addiction-like behavior.
Critics argue that warning labels on social media platforms may not be effective in addressing the issue of mental health risks associated with social media use. Dr. Ambreen Ghori, a psychiatrist at Bowen Center, believes that social media can contribute to a distorted perception of the world, especially for those who already view it as a place of judgment and criticism. This can worsen symptoms of depression and anxiety in individuals who are already struggling.
Nancy Michael, the Director of Neuroscience and Behavior at Notre Dame, argues that social media can have extreme effects on young individuals’ behavior and habits. She highlights how some students limit their usage while others sacrifice their sleep to engage in excessive scrolling late into the night. The appeal of social media can have profound effects on how young people prioritize activities and impacts their overall mental health.
Despite these concerns, there are also many benefits associated with social media use, including connecting with friends and family members across the globe and accessing information about various topics. It is essential for individuals to be aware of both the positive and negative aspects of social media use so they can make informed decisions about how they engage with these platforms.
In conclusion, Congress should consider putting warning labels on social media platforms like Facebook and Instagram to disclose the potential mental health risks associated with their use by young users under 18 years old. While there are many benefits associated with social media use, it is essential for individuals to be aware of both its positive and negative aspects so they can make informed decisions about how they engage with these platforms.
However, critics argue that adding warning labels may not be enough as social media has already taken hold on our attention due to its addictive nature caused by dopamine release in our brains’ reward pathway. They suggest implementing other measures such as limiting screen time or promoting healthy alternatives like face-to-face interactions or outdoor activities.
Furthermore, some experts argue that social media can disrupt normal brain development during adolescence when networks are still forming. Nancy Michael suggests that parents should encourage their children to engage in diverse activities outside of screens and promote healthy sleep habits.
Overall, it is crucial for both policymakers and individuals alike to understand both the positive and negative effects of social media use while considering ways to mitigate its harmful effects on mental health without stifling its potential benefits entirely.
