The Politics of Compromise: The Senate’s Delay in Treating Bases and Fiscal Laws Sparks Controversy

Laws customized for vulnerabilities

The Senate postponed the treatment of the Bases and Fiscal laws for a week, sparking debate over the motives behind the decision. Some believe that this delay allows senators and governors to gain more advantages from the government, while others argue that a shorter period would be more cost-effective. The government did not fulfill all the demands in exchange for the passage of the laws, which could prove costly if they cannot be implemented.

In an effort to compromise with Congress, the government initially pushed for a DNU and an omnibus law but ended up accepting compromises that aligned with what Congress could deliver. This reflects the government’s weak position in terms of votes, party support, and legislative power. Senators Guillermo Francos and Daniel Scioli played key roles in shaping the legislation behind closed doors to ensure satisfaction for all parties involved.

The legislative process will consume significant energy from both governments and Congress over the next two weeks as negotiations continue to shape the final legislation. Key issues at stake include privatizations, investment regimes, salary tax, labor reform, and trust funds. The government aims for general approval of these projects with specific modifications but disagreements within and between parties could complicate this process.

Former senator Jorge Yoma criticized the handling of legislation in committees by highlighting the need for consensus and avoiding evasive tactics. The session is expected to be lengthy and contentious with intense debates likely to occur. The government’s ability to navigate these complexities and secure approval will be a test of its governing capabilities.

The different strategies employed by various parties and individuals such as Martin Lousteau add layers of complexity to this legislative process.

Leave a Reply