In August 2023, former “Bild” editor-in-chief Julian Reichelt sparked controversy with a social media post that claimed Germany had paid 370 million euros in development aid to the Taliban. The federal government took legal action against Reichelt, resulting in an interim injunction being issued by the Court of Appeal prohibiting him from making critical statements about the federal government.
Reichelt argued that his freedom of expression was violated and appealed to the Federal Constitutional Court. The Court ruled in favor of Reichelt, stating that the Court of Appeal had ignored the context of his statement. Criticism, even if harsh or polemical, is protected by the fundamental right to freedom of expression. State institutions, including the government, should be able to withstand public criticism.
The Constitutional Court overturned the Berlin decision and referred the case back to the Court of Appeal for further consideration. In conclusion, this dispute serves as a reminder of the complexities surrounding freedom of expression and public discourse. The court emphasized that balancing freedom of expression with protecting state institutions is important and that criticism mixes facts and opinions should be safeguarded as a fundamental right.
