President Biden’s proposed ceasefire in Gaza has sparked both hope and skepticism. The three-phase plan put forward by Israel includes a complete ceasefire, the release of hostages held by Hamas, and the withdrawal of Israeli troops from populated areas in Gaza. While this plan could lead to positive outcomes, doubts remain about whether it will address the core issues of the conflict.
In response to the proposal, Hamas has expressed a willingness to engage in constructive dialogue to achieve a permanent ceasefire in Gaza. However, concerns have been raised about the specifics of the agreement and its alignment with Israel’s objectives. Critics argue that the timing of the proposal is too late and that it does not take into account recent developments in Israeli government discussions. They also question whether concessions required from Israel are fair and reasonable.
Key details about the ceasefire proposal, such as the definition of a “full” ceasefire and the withdrawal of Israeli troops from certain areas of Gaza, remain unclear. Questions about the release of hostages and Hamas’s disarmament also linger. Furthermore, there is uncertainty about the role of international community in ensuring Hamas does not rearm after Israeli troops withdraw and potential for Hamas to regain power after withdrawal raise doubts about long-term efficacy of ceasefire.
While President Biden’s proposal may offer a temporary respite from hostilities, it remains to be seen whether it will address underlying issues that have fueled conflict between Israel and Hamas. A comprehensive solution is needed that addresses core demands of both parties if lasting peace is achieved in region.
