Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar resisted calls for a ceasefire with Israel for months, believing that continued fighting and Palestinian casualties would benefit his organization. Despite facing criticism from the international community, Sinwar calculated that the conflict would ultimately work in Hamas’s favor.
In private messages to Hamas officials and mediators, Sinwar expressed a belief that Israel had more to lose in the conflict. He cited historical examples of civilian casualties during national liberation wars as justification for his tactics. Sinwar used hostages as bargaining chips to delay Israeli ground operations in Gaza.
Sinwar’s past experiences, including time spent in an Israeli prison and leadership roles within Hamas, influenced his approach to the conflict. He believed that escalating violence would ultimately benefit Hamas and put pressure on Israel. However, he faced pushback from other factions within Hamas who were more open to negotiating a peaceful resolution.
As the conflict dragged on, Sinwar’s messaging became more cautious and encrypted, indicating a shift in tactics. He compared the war to significant historical battles, emphasizing the importance of perseverance and sacrifice in the struggle against Israel. Despite mounting humanitarian and diplomatic costs, Sinwar remained determined to fight on.
Ultimately, it was Sinwar’s resilience and strategic decisions that shaped the course of the conflict between Hamas and Israel. His willingness to use violence and unconventional tactics reflected his dedication to achieving Hamas’s goals and his belief in their effectiveness.
