Controversy Surrounds Delay in Arms Sale to Israel as White House Faces Criticism for Gaza Death Toll

The delay in the sale of precision weapons to Israel has raised concerns about the US’s intentions to slow down the supply of weapons to its main ally in the Middle East. This comes as the administration rejected Israel’s plan to attack the southern city of Rafah in Gaza Strip. The White House has faced criticism for the death toll and destruction caused by US-supplied weapons in Gaza.

The proposed sale of up to 6,500 JDAM munition systems worth up to $260 million has not moved forward since Congress first learned of it in January. The administration has not officially announced the sale, effectively stalling the deal. Additionally, the administration has not advanced the process of notifying Congress of additional arms deals totaling over a billion dollars, including tank ammunition, military vehicles, and mortar bombs.

The delay in arms sales to Israel comes at a time when there is growing pressure from Democrats in Congress to reduce weapons supply to Israel in order to pressure it into preventing civilian casualties in Gaza. This delay is seen as unusual, especially during wartime and for deals involving Israel. Protests on college campuses have also been held over the US’s support for Israel’s actions in Gaza, including arms sales.

Despite this delay, it is important to note that the US has provided billions of dollars in security assistance to Israel since the conflict began. Israel receives significant military aid from the US, and Congress recently passed a bill providing additional aid to Israel. However, recent months have seen a slowdown in weapons flow due to other priorities like Ukraine and domestic needs.

The delay in arms sales to Israel has sparked debate and criticism among many people who question whether this move is consistent with America’s commitment as an ally to its friend state in Middle East region.

Overall, while it is understandable that some may question this move, it is important for policymakers on both sides of