The recent decision by the US Supreme Court to grant judicial immunity in the case of the invasion of the Capitol could have significant implications for other cases against former President Donald Trump. In its ruling, the Court stated that former presidents can claim immunity for official acts carried out during their time in office. However, there is no immunity for unofficial acts.
This decision was reached by a 6-3 vote and could impact ongoing cases against Trump in the American justice system. The Supreme Court’s decision in this case originated from a federal court in Washington where Trump was indicted on three counts related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results and instigate the Capitol attack.
The distinction made by the Court between Trump’s public and private actions could have ramifications for various legal cases against him. While actions taken while he was president are immune, those taken in the private sphere may still be subject to legal action. This decision is seen as a victory for Trump as it could prevent further trials before the upcoming elections and potentially impact any convictions related to the 2020 election results.
Experts like Roberto Uebel and Ricardo Caichiolo believe that this decision could affect the outcome of cases against Trump. They suggest that his defense lawyers may use this decision to delay or annul legal proceedings, which would be a strategic advantage for him in his electoral campaign. Despite some controversies, Trump’s camp is framing this decision as a total victory in the American justice system.
:quality(75)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/elcomercio/USQRAVBPFBD4PLYURKSMCHLVSA.jpg)